In a recent LinkedIn post, Kobi Omenaka discusses the implications of advanced AI models being withheld from the public, questioning the narrative of responsible development. Omenaka highlights the release of a powerful AI by Anthropic, which reportedly identified a significant security flaw in a major operating system, and notes the company’s decision to deem it “too dangerous for the public.”
Omenaka points out the apparent contradiction in this decision, stating:
“But apparently not ‘too dangerous’ for Amazon, Apple and Microsoft. Three companies that, coincidentally, are among Anthropic’s biggest commercial partners.”
The author, who identifies as a daily user of Anthropic’s Claude AI for various tasks, expresses skepticism about the motivations behind withholding the technology. Omenaka suggests that the move is not solely about caution but rather a form of “controlled distribution deal dressed up as responsibility theatre.”
Analyzing the Ethics of AI Distribution
Kobi Omenaka argues that the eventual widespread availability of such powerful AI is inevitable. The central concern, according to Omenaka, lies in who establishes the rules governing this technology before it dictates its own. This leads to a critical question about the influence of financial stakeholders on the timeline of AI deployment.
The Role of Commercial Partnerships
Omenaka draws attention to the significant commercial ties between Anthropic and major tech corporations like Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft. This relationship, as highlighted by Omenaka, raises questions about whether commercial interests might be influencing decisions about public access to advanced AI capabilities. The author posits that those with a financial stake are in a position to control the pace at which this technology becomes accessible.
“The technology is coming to everyone eventually. The only question is who writes the rules before it does.”
The author’s perspective suggests a need for greater transparency and public discourse regarding the release of AI technologies that possess such profound capabilities. Omenaka implies that the current approach, driven by select commercial partners, may not adequately represent the broader public interest.
Public Input on AI Release
A key point raised by Kobi Omenaka is the question of public involvement in decisions about AI deployment. Omenaka directly asks whether the public should have a say in determining when and how highly advanced AI models are released.
“Yes or No: Should the public have a say in when AI like this gets released?”
This rhetorical question underscores Omenaka’s belief that decisions with such significant societal implications should not be made solely by a few powerful entities or their commercial partners. The author’s post encourages readers to consider the broader ethical landscape of AI development and distribution, emphasizing the potential risks and the importance of inclusive decision-making processes.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Kobi Omenaka on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on April 9, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →