In a recent LinkedIn post, Steven Bartlett shared his thoughts on a conversation with Scott Galloway, emphasizing Galloway’s value as a contrarian voice in the business and technology landscape. Bartlett positions Galloway as someone who prioritizes accuracy over popularity, a trait he deems exceptionally valuable in an era where public discourse often favors consensus and popular opinion.
Bartlett introduced the discussion by highlighting Galloway’s unique ability to analyze complex intersections of business, technology, and society, and translate these insights into tangible impacts on individuals’ lives. He specifically noted Galloway’s willingness to challenge prevailing narratives.
“Today’s guest on The Diary Of A CEO doesn’t try to be liked. He tries to be right.”
This emphasis on being “right” rather than “liked” is a central theme Bartlett explores, suggesting it’s a rare and crucial quality. As Bartlett points out, the modern incentive structure often pushes individuals towards saying what is popular, making Galloway’s approach stand out.
Galloway’s Critique of Tech Leadership and AI
Bartlett’s post outlines several key areas discussed with Galloway, including the motivations behind tech CEOs’ communication strategies and the future of artificial intelligence. According to Bartlett, the conversation delved into why tech leaders might be perceived as “selling fear” and the implications of this strategy.
Furthermore, Bartlett highlighted Galloway’s perspective on skills that are becoming obsolete in the current market. The discussion also touched upon the more concerning and less-discussed aspects of AI development, prompting readers to consider a darker narrative than is commonly presented.
“Why are AI CEOs building bunkers?”
This provocative question, as relayed by Bartlett, suggests a deep-seated concern about the future implications of AI, moving beyond the typical optimistic outlook often associated with technological advancement.
The Value of Challenging Perspectives
Bartlett articulated his personal value in these conversations, explaining that he often turns to Galloway to help shape his own opinions on significant global issues. He finds that Galloway consistently offers a unique and clarifying perspective, even when Bartlett doesn’t entirely agree.
“Conversations like this force me to think differently. There are moments where I don’t agree, but I always leave seeing things more clearly.”
This sentiment underscores Bartlett’s belief in the power of intellectual friction. As Bartlett explains, these dialogues serve to challenge deeply held assumptions, leading to a more nuanced understanding of complex topics. The process, according to Bartlett, involves confronting preconceived notions that one might not even realize they hold.
Bartlett concludes his post by engaging his audience, asking if the described episode sounds like one they would be interested in watching. This interactive approach is typical of Bartlett’s engagement strategy, aiming to foster community and gauge interest around the content he produces.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Steven Bartlett on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on May 4, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →