In a recent LinkedIn post, Kevin O’Leary addresses concerns surrounding the development of AI data centers, particularly in Utah, and outlines a vision where these facilities can benefit local communities by contributing to the power grid. O’Leary aims to reframe the narrative around data centers, moving away from perceptions of them as solely consumers of energy and instead presenting them as potential partners in energy provision.
Addressing Community Concerns and Energy Contribution
O’Leary highlights a key question emerging from Utah: whether the energy generated for AI data centers can be fed back into the local grid. He confirms that this is indeed possible, a point he believes fundamentally alters the public perception of these large-scale projects. Instead of being viewed negatively, O’Leary suggests data centers can become assets that help power the region.
“People in Utah have started asking us an important question, when you build these power facilities for AI data centers, can some of that energy be sold back into the local grid? The answer is yes. That completely changes the conversation.”
This perspective challenges the prevalent narrative that often labels data centers as purely energy-intensive entities. As O’Leary notes, this dual role of supporting AI infrastructure while also bolstering local energy supply is a significant shift in how these developments can be integrated into communities.
Scale and Phased Development
Dispelling notions of rapid, unchecked expansion, O’Leary clarifies the actual scale and methodology of the proposed project. He emphasizes that the development is not an overnight construction of the world’s largest data center. Instead, the initial phase involves a manageable 1.5 gigawatts, with a net IT load of 1 gigawatt, which he describes as a “small fraction” of the ultimate long-term plan. This phased approach is designed to test and prove the operational model effectively.
“And despite the headlines, we’re not building the world’s largest data center overnight. We’re starting with just 1.5 gigawatts with 1 gigawatt of net IT load a small fraction of the long-term proposal and proving the model first.”
Furthermore, O’Leary corrects misconceptions about the physical footprint of the project. Contrary to assumptions of vast land acquisition, he states that the full build-out will span approximately 10,000 to 13,000 acres, with a significant portion—7,500 acres—earmarked for preservation. This detail is crucial in addressing environmental and land-use concerns often associated with such large developments.
Transparency and Community Engagement
A core element of O’Leary’s message is a commitment to transparency and direct community engagement. He expresses a desire for residents of Box Elder County to visit and inspect the facility themselves. This invitation is extended to allow the public to review critical operational aspects firsthand, including adherence to EPA air quality standards, water permit compliance, and noise regulations.
“We want the people of Box Elder County to come see it themselves, the EPA air quality standards, the water permits, the noise compliance, and how the project actually operates before anything scales further.”
According to O’Leary, this proactive approach to showing the operational realities of the data center is vital before any further scaling of the project proceeds. By fostering this level of openness, he aims to build trust and demonstrate responsible development practices. Kevin O’Leary argues that this direct engagement is key to mitigating local opposition and fostering a collaborative relationship between the data center developers and the community it serves.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Kevin O'Leary on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on May 18, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →