In a recent LinkedIn post, Kevin O’Leary discusses what he describes as coordinated opposition to his company’s energy and data center projects in Utah, alleging foreign influence is at play. O’Leary, known for his business acumen and media presence, used the platform to address what he termed “misinformation” surrounding the Utah project and to outline his findings on the sources of this opposition.
Addressing Project Misinformation
O’Leary’s post directly tackles several claims made against his venture, asserting that the project is not draining the Great Salt Lake, stealing Utah’s power, or being built at an unmanageable scale. He emphasized the company’s adherence to legal and environmental processes, including obtaining necessary permits for air, water, and noise, and providing full disclosure prior to construction.
“Everybody living in these communities deserves answers, and every concern should go through the proper legal and environmental process. That means permits for air, water, noise, temperature, and full disclosure before anything gets built,” O’Leary stated in his post. He further clarified the project’s self-sufficiency and economic benefits, noting, “We’re building our own power generation, following the law, and creating thousands of jobs and major tax revenue for Utah communities.”
Allegations of Foreign-Linked Opposition
The core of O’Leary’s message on LinkedIn centers on his investigation into the origins of the opposition. He explained that his inquiry into the “coordinated opposition” led him to identify specific organizations, including Alliance for a Better Utah, and funding networks associated with groups like Arabella.
According to O’Leary, a review of IRS filings and audits convinced him of a more significant, external influence. “So I started asking where all this coordinated opposition was coming from. That led us to organizations like Alliance for a Better Utah and funding networks connected through groups like Arabella,” he wrote. O’Leary posits that this opposition is not organic but is being fueled by external interests.
Concerns Over Foreign Funding
Kevin O’Leary expressed particular concern about the alleged source of the funding for these opposition efforts. He stated his belief that foreign-linked money, with specific mention of interests connected to China, is being used to impede energy and data center development within the United States.
“After reviewing IRS filings and conducting audits, I became convinced that foreign linked money, including interests connected to China, is helping fuel efforts to slow power generation and data center development in the United States,” O’Leary concluded in his post. He frames this as a deliberate attempt to hinder American infrastructure development.
O’Leary’s Call for Transparency
Throughout his post, O’Leary advocates for a transparent and legally sound process for addressing community concerns. His detailed account aims to counter what he perceives as unfounded criticism and to highlight the potential impact of foreign entities on domestic infrastructure projects. The businessman’s analysis underscores his perspective on the intersection of business development, regulatory processes, and geopolitical influences.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Kevin O'Leary on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on May 26, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →