In a recent LinkedIn post, Teresa Torres delves into a critical and often uncomfortable question facing the technology industry: Has the innovation we’ve championed ultimately made the world a worse place? Torres, a prominent voice in product development, shared insights from a candid conversation with Petra Wille, where they wrestled with the unintended consequences of technologies like the internet, social media, and AI.
The discussion, presented as a podcast episode, doesn’t shy away from acknowledging the negative impacts. Torres highlights the internal conflict many tech professionals experience when confronted with the reality of their creations.
“Both Petra and Teresa reflect on having been active contributors to technologies — social media, the internet, AI — that have had real negative consequences, even when built with good intentions.”
As Teresa Torres points out, a significant part of the problem stems from the industry’s evolving motivations. The initial drive to improve lives appears to have been overshadowed by a pursuit of profit at any human cost.
The Role of Greed and Human Cost
Torres elaborates on how the narrative within tech has shifted, moving away from a focus on societal benefit towards pure value extraction. This shift, she suggests, is at the heart of many of the industry’s current issues.
“Greed as the root cause: The shift from ‘make people’s lives better’ to ‘extract maximum value at any human cost’ is framing a lot of what feels broken about tech right now,” the post explains, summarizing a key takeaway from the conversation.
This focus on extraction has, according to Torres and Wille, contributed to a growing sense of isolation. They observe that technology, rather than supplementing human connection, has often been used to replace it, exacerbating a widespread loneliness crisis.
“Technology has been used to replace human connection rather than supplement it — and the two hosts see this as one of the most pressing consequences of how the industry has operated.”
Challenging the Echo Chamber and Envisioning a Better Future
A particularly striking point raised by Teresa Torres is the disconnect between the tech world and the general public. She recounts a moment of realization when a non-tech family member described the internet as “net negative.” This observation underscores how insulated tech workers can be from the real-world impact of their products.
The Echo Chamber Problem
“Teresa’s floored reaction when a family member called the internet ‘net negative’ is a reminder of how insulated tech workers are from how the rest of the world experiences their work,” the post states.
However, the conversation doesn’t end with critique. Torres and Wille also explore hopeful alternatives. They discuss the potential for a more responsible, community-centered approach to technology, including the concept of “mom and pop tech.” This model envisions hyper-local, bespoke software designed to serve specific neighborhoods rather than large shareholder interests.
“Rather than massive horizontal platforms built to scale, there’s a hopeful model emerging where AI enables hyper-local, community-specific software — bespoke tools built by and for neighborhoods, not VCs.”
Torres concludes by emphasizing that the future of technology is not predetermined. She asserts that individuals within the industry still have agency, influencing the direction of innovation through their choices about where to work, what to build, and which narratives to amplify.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Teresa Torres on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on May 26, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →