Jasmin Alić Critiques LinkedIn Features, Praises Platform’s Community

J

Jasmin Alić

LinkedIn Author

I coach(ed) your favorite LinkedIn creators | Founder, Link Up Community (1,000+ members in 80+ countries) | Coaching founders to monetize their expertise, no matter the industry

In a recent LinkedIn post, Jasmin Alić shared a candid assessment of the professional networking platform, highlighting areas where features could be improved while also celebrating its positive community aspects. Alić’s commentary focuses on the utility and perceived limitations of several key LinkedIn functionalities, offering constructive criticism alongside appreciation for the platform’s core strengths.

Analyzing LinkedIn’s Feature Set

Jasmin Alić began by expressing a desire for enhanced functionality within LinkedIn’s existing tools. A primary point of contention for Alić is the Profile Views history. While appreciating its existence, Alić expressed a wish for more robust filtering capabilities, akin to those available in the platform’s general search function.

Profile Views history → but I wish we could use the SAME filters with profile views as we can with the regular Search function. That would make it 10/10.

The critique extends to post analytics, specifically impressions. Alić argues that the current implementation, which omits the names of those viewing posts, renders the data less valuable for genuine analysis. According to Alić, the absence of this information diminishes the practical application of impression metrics.

The Value of Names in Analytics

Alić elaborated on this point, suggesting that LinkedIn could easily bridge this gap by integrating the naming functionality from Profile Views into the Impressions feature. The post humorously posits that the two features are nearly identical in their potential application, with the key differentiator being the presence of identifying names.

Impressions and detailed post analytics → but “Names” are still missing. Look, I love analyzing posts just as much as the next person. But without names, Impressions are worthless to me. There, I said it.

This sentiment was echoed regarding comment impressions, where Alić pointed out a similar lack of actionable detail. The question posed is rhetorical yet pointed: what value does a high number of impressions hold without context?

Comment impressions → but yep, same issue with “Names”. Congrats, you got 10K views! Now what?

Appreciating LinkedIn’s Community and Connectivity

Despite these criticisms, Jasmin Alić also took the opportunity to highlight the aspects of LinkedIn that foster a positive user experience. Alić emphasized the emergence of a supportive community culture, particularly the genuine support offered to users by others, even strangers.

Furthermore, Alić expressed appreciation for the platform’s direct messaging capabilities, including the InMail feature, which facilitates broad professional outreach. The ability to “Follow” users directly from comment threads and the provision of unlimited connection request notes were also cited as valuable functionalities that enhance user interaction and networking.

In Alić’s view, these positive elements underscore a strong affection for the platform, driving the desire to see its features refined further. The post concludes with an open invitation for others to share their own suggestions and desired features, reinforcing the idea of collaborative improvement for the LinkedIn ecosystem.

📝 About This Content

This article is based on insights shared by Jasmin Alić on LinkedIn.

📅 Originally posted on August 6, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →