In a recent LinkedIn post, Charlie Hills 🦩 shared a compelling comparison of AI video editing tools, pitting Fable against GPT-6 Astra in a real-world test. Hills 🦩 presented a side-by-side analysis of their capabilities, using his own YouTube editing process as the benchmark.
The core of Hills 🦩’s experiment involved providing both AI models with the same raw video footage and a clear brief. The task required the AIs to replicate his professional workflow, which includes cutting out pauses, translating spoken words into visual elements, and synchronizing the edit precisely with his voiceover. This hands-on approach allowed Hills 🦩 to directly assess how each AI performed under conditions mirroring his actual content creation demands.
“I gave Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra the same raw video, the same brief and my real YouTube editing process (the one I use for my own videos).”
The Editing Challenge: Replicating a Human Workflow
As Charlie Hills 🦩 details, the objective was to see which AI could most effectively handle the nuanced aspects of video editing that often require human judgment. This wasn’t just about basic cuts; it was about understanding the rhythm of speech, identifying opportunities for visual enhancement, and maintaining the creator’s intended pacing. Hills 🦩 emphasized that the challenge was designed to mimic his authentic editing routine.
According to Hills 🦩, the specific instructions given to both AI systems were identical:
“Both had to cut the pauses, turn my words into visuals and time everything to my voice.”
This rigorous testing methodology allowed Hills 🦩 to generate a direct comparison, showcasing the output of each AI side-by-side. The post then invited his audience to participate in the evaluation.
Seeking Audience Verdict on AI Video Edits
The ultimate goal of Charlie Hills 🦩’s post was to gather feedback from his professional network. By presenting the two distinct AI-generated edits, he opened the floor for discussion and solicited opinions on which output was superior. This interactive approach not only highlighted the capabilities and potential differences between Fable and GPT-6 Astra but also engaged the community in a relevant conversation about the future of AI in creative industries.
Hills 🦩 concluded his post by directly asking for his followers’ input:
“And now I want your verdict. Which edit came out better?”
Furthermore, Hills 🦩 provided a link for those interested in learning more about his process or the tools used, directing readers to a guide on the subject.
In Charlie Hills 🦩’s view, this kind of practical, comparative testing is crucial for understanding the real-world applicability of emerging AI technologies. By applying these tools to his own established workflow, he offers a valuable, grounded perspective for other content creators and businesses exploring AI solutions for video production.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Charlie Hills 🦩 on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on September 9, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →