In a recent LinkedIn post, Ankur Warikoo discusses the often-hidden nature of company salaries, arguing that this practice stems more from a lack of robust systems than genuine confidentiality. Warikoo, a prominent entrepreneur and personal finance advocate, shared his perspective on why transparency, particularly regarding compensation, is crucial for building disciplined and effective organizations.
The entrepreneur begins by challenging the common practice of companies expending significant effort to conceal salary information. He suggests that the perceived need for secrecy is often a smokescreen for underlying systemic deficiencies.
“Companies spend absurd amounts of energy hiding salaries, which everyone already knows. Why? It is not confidentiality. It is often a lack of a proper system, disguised as policy.”
Warikoo draws a parallel to his own experience in personal finance, where he advocates for openness about financial matters. He explains that by making his own financial data public – including business income, investments, salary, and even mistakes – he aimed to demonstrate the clarity that comes from abandoning secrecy.
Challenging Conventional Salary Practices
Warikoo’s approach at his own startup is to make all employee salaries public. He asserts that this isn’t merely an act of altruism but a strategic decision designed to enforce discipline within the company’s hiring and compensation processes.
He outlines a clear set of principles his startup follows when hiring new employees, emphasizing a system-driven approach to compensation:
- No one is asked to take a pay cut.
- Previous salary history is never requested; only future expectations are considered.
- Roles are benchmarked, and the company walks away if it cannot meet the candidate’s expectations.
- If an offer is made, the candidate understands the rationale behind it.
- Offers are withdrawn respectfully if a mutual understanding cannot be reached.
According to Warikoo, this structured process ensures fairness and clarity for both the employer and the employee. It moves the conversation away from subjective negotiation tactics and towards objective role valuation.
Transparency as a Systems Stance
The core of Warikoo’s argument is that transparency in salaries should be viewed not as a moral imperative but as a fundamental aspect of a well-designed business system. He contends that hiding salary information often masks inefficiencies and can lead to subjective decision-making.
“Transparency is not a moral stance. It is a systems stance.”
He further elaborates on the common scenario where a rival company’s offer significantly influences a counter-offer, often accompanied by a directive to keep salaries confidential. Warikoo suggests this reactive approach is a symptom of a weak system, rather than a policy rooted in genuine confidentiality needs.
“A 30 percent hike at a rival company magically translates into a 30 percent counter-offer. With a ‘Your salary is confidential. Do not share it with anyone.'”
By making salaries public, Warikoo believes his startup is compelled to maintain rigorous standards in job benchmarking and compensation, ensuring that offers are justifiable and aligned with market realities. This approach, he implies, fosters a more mature and disciplined organizational culture.
Warikoo concluded his post by noting that the piece was a reproduction of his weekly newsletter, which he sends to over 118,000 subscribers, covering various insights including books, quotes, and thoughts of the week.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Ankur Warikoo on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on December 19, 2025 | View original post on LinkedIn →