In a recent LinkedIn post, Ashleigh Early challenges the common sales directive to “create more urgency,” arguing that effective sales professionals focus on uncovering existing urgency rather than manufacturing it. Early asserts that true urgency stems from the prospect’s needs and the consequences of inaction, not from the seller’s objectives or external pressures like quarter-end.
Ashleigh Early highlights the fundamental misunderstanding behind the push for manufactured urgency. “Sorry but no sales rep can CREATE urgency,” Early states unequivocally. “The best sales reps know how to UNCOVER urgency…and understand that urgency is defined by the prospect/company needs.” This distinction is crucial, as Early points out that factors like EOQ, saving money, or pleasing leadership are irrelevant to the prospect’s genuine need for a solution.
The True Nature of Prospect Urgency
According to Ashleigh Early, the core of urgency lies in a prospect’s perception of immediate pain and future negative consequences. “Urgency is, at it’s core, ‘Ow ow ow. This hurts me right now AND if I don’t fix it there will be consequences’,” Early explains. This perspective shifts the focus from the seller’s product to the buyer’s internal reality. Ashleigh Early emphasizes that the most successful sales representatives strive to understand the entirety of their prospect’s situation, recognizing that their product is just one component of a larger business ecosystem.
Navigating the ‘Easy Road’ and the ‘Hard Road’ to Urgency
Ashleigh Early outlines two primary paths sales reps encounter when seeking to identify urgency. The “Easy Road,” which accounts for less than 10% of deals, occurs when prospects readily articulate not only their pain points but also the ramifications of not addressing them, often with a defined timeline. However, Ashleigh Early notes that the majority of deals fall into the “Hard Road” category (less than 90%). In these scenarios, while a sale might be beneficial, the prospect struggles to articulate or acknowledge the pain and its consequences, leading to a lack of prioritization.
Adapting the Pitch for Prioritized Problems
When faced with the “Hard Road,” Ashleigh Early advises sales professionals to adapt their approach. Instead of forcing the issue, the strategy should be to align the pitch with other problems that the prospect *does* prioritize and can articulate pain and consequences for. Early provides examples, such as framing a solution in terms of freeing up team time for other critical initiatives or enabling a prospect to manage an acquisition more effectively by offloading a related task.
Recognizing Valid Reasons for De-prioritization
In Ashleigh Early’s view, the hallmark of truly skilled sales professionals is their ability to recognize when a prospect has a valid reason to de-prioritize their offering. “Those ‘Best Sales Reps’? They also know that it’s entirely possible/likely that the prospect has a COMPLETELY VALID REASON not to prioritize your product,” Early writes. Instead of persisting fruitlessly, these reps understand the value of refocusing their efforts on more receptive opportunities. Ashleigh Early illustrates this with an example of gracefully rescheduling a call when a prospect is clearly overwhelmed, offering a future touchpoint and a small gesture of goodwill.
Ultimately, Ashleigh Early’s insights underscore a shift from aggressive selling tactics to a more empathetic and strategic approach, grounded in understanding and respecting the prospect’s genuine priorities and constraints.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Ashleigh Early on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on May 21, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →