In a recent LinkedIn post, Florence Divet ☀️ delves into the fundamental nature of conflict, arguing that most disputes stem not from factual disagreements but from differing perspectives. The post, which has garnered significant attention, suggests that a key leadership failing occurs when individuals become defensive rather than curious about opposing viewpoints.
Florence Divet ☀️ highlights a common, yet detrimental, assumption: ‘If you don’t see what I see, you must be wrong.’ This mindset, according to the post, is a primary driver of team breakdowns, leadership failures, and eroded relationships.
“Most arguments are not about facts. They’re about perspective.”
The core of Florence Divet ☀️’s argument is that distinct vantage points naturally create different realities. The true measure of an effective leader, she posits, is not the insistence on being correct, but the willingness to explore alternative viewpoints.
The Strategic Advantage of Curiosity
Florence Divet ☀️ challenges the traditional notion of strength in leadership, reframing it as the capacity for intellectual humility and curiosity. Instead of asserting their own view, leaders are encouraged to adopt a more inquisitive approach.
As Florence Divet ☀️ poses:
“The smartest leader in the room is not the one who insists on being right. It is the one who asks: ➤ “What might I be missing?” ➤ “What does this look like from their side?” ➤ “Could both perspectives hold part of the truth?””
This approach is not presented as a sign of weakness, but as a form of ‘strategic intelligence.’ The post illustrates this with relatable examples from various domains:
Real-World Applications of Perspective-Taking
Florence Divet ☀️ provides concrete scenarios to underscore the importance of considering multiple perspectives:
- In business: A CFO’s focus on risk can contrast with a CEO’s drive for growth.
- Within teams: A manager might perceive underperformance, while an employee experiences unclear expectations.
- In personal life: One individual might interpret an event as rejection, while another sees it as self-protection.
In each case, the situation is identical, but the ‘lens’ through which it is viewed differs, leading to vastly different interpretations and potential conflicts.
“The real breakthrough often happens when people stop defending position… And start exchanging perspective.”
A Practical Framework for Conflict Resolution
To foster a more constructive environment, Florence Divet ☀️ outlines a practical, three-step leadership shift:
- Pause before reacting: Discern whether the disagreement is rooted in objective facts or subjective viewpoints.
- Get curious: Actively solicit and listen to the other person’s perspective before jumping to conclusions.
- Expand your lens: Consciously work to broaden your understanding, thereby shrinking personal blind spots and enabling better decision-making.
Florence Divet ☀️ concludes by emphasizing that true maturity lies in the ability to see beyond one’s own immediate viewpoint. The critical question for navigating conflict, she suggests, is whether one is fighting for objective truth or merely defending their personal angle—a distinction that can fundamentally alter outcomes.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Florence Divet ☀️ on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on July 10, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →