In a recent LinkedIn post, Seth Godin π discusses a fundamental disconnect that often exists between the effort invested in creating something and the actual value it delivers to an audience. Godin π challenges the common assumption that more effort automatically equates to higher value, arguing that the marketplace prioritizes perceived need and desire over the creator’s exertion.
Godin π highlights this discrepancy with compelling examples, contrasting the rapid creation of The Beatles’ “A Hard Day’s Night” with the extensive five-year development of Tom Scholz’s “More Than a Feeling.” He posits that while both achieved success, one was not inherently 1,500 times more valuable than the other, despite the vast difference in creation time.
“A Hard Day’s Night took less than 15 hours from idea to finished record. More Than a Feeling , from Tom Scholz and Boston, took five years. Each pleased their audiences. One is not 1,500 times more valuable than the other.”
The author further elaborates on how scarcity, sometimes a byproduct of effort, can influence perceived value, but emphasizes this is not a universal rule. He points out the common scenario of academic pursuits, where a student might spend years on a Ph.D. thesis, only for a committee member to review it in a fraction of that time. As Godin π notes, “The studentβs effort is not related to the committeeβs.” This illustrates that the audience’s or recipient’s perspective on value is rarely tied to the creator’s labor.
The Marketplace vs. The Mythology of Creation
Seth Godin π argues that the prevailing narrative around creation often leads us to overemphasize the effort involved when assessing worth. However, in practical terms, consumers and audiences seldom make this calculation.
“If the creation is what the audience needs or wants, it actually doesnβt matter how hard it was to create, or who or what created it.”
This perspective presents a significant challenge, particularly in fields like education and fitness. Godin π raises pertinent questions about the true objective of educational assignments: Is it to gauge a student’s capacity for hard work, or their ability to produce high-quality, judiciously crafted work? Similarly, he questions whether a personal trainer’s role is to push for maximum exertion or to facilitate incremental improvements over time.
The Trap of Rewarding Effort Over Outcome
Godin π identifies a critical pitfall in focusing solely on the effort expended, especially when the goal is to improve performance or outcomes. He critiques the notion of “A for effort,” suggesting that while it might be a recognized concept, the natural talents and achievements of individuals often receive more accolades than sheer perseverance or overcoming obstacles.
“When developing our skills, effort is essential. But when engaging in the marketplace, Iβm not sure it matters. We should be consistent about which weβre seeking to reward.”
Ultimately, Seth Godin π advocates for a clear distinction between the role of effort in skill development and its relevance in the commercial sphere. He urges creators and educators to be consistent in identifying and rewarding what truly matters: the value delivered to the audience or the market, rather than the labor invested.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Seth Godin π on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on August 5, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn β