Lee McCabe Challenges Marketing Agency Models in Private Equity

L

Lee McCabe

LinkedIn Author

Private Equity, Digital Value Creation, Board Member, Investor

In a recent LinkedIn post, Lee McCabe delves into the common pitfalls of marketing agency relationships within private equity-backed companies, arguing that a lack of accountability and misaligned incentives often lead to ineffective partnerships.

McCabe highlights a prevalent sentiment among CEOs in portfolio companies, noting that the typical marketing strategy often boils down to maintaining the status quo with an agency until the relationship becomes untenable. He points out the subtle yet telling indicator of a failing partnership: the CEO’s resigned statement, “we should probably replace them,” rather than outright dissatisfaction.

“Most companies I speak to don’t really like their current marketing partner. They tolerate them. Like a recurring subscription you keep meaning to cancel. Not because the people are bad, but because the incentives are.”

The Cycle of Ineffective Marketing Partnerships

Lee McCabe argues that this widespread tolerance stems from a fundamental misalignment of incentives between marketing agencies and their clients. He elaborates on the common deal structure, which he describes as “lots of output, very little accountability, and a reporting layer that can’t survive contact with a CFO.” This often results in clients being sold “strategy” but receiving only output, promised performance but getting mere explanations, and asking for commercial clarity only to be presented with dashboards that lack practical financial reconciliation.

According to McCabe, the issue is compounded by a reluctance to change. He states:

“And the bit nobody likes to say: plenty of teams are scared to switch because at least the current mess is familiar.”

This fear of the unknown, McCabe suggests, allows suboptimal relationships to persist, hindering true growth and value creation.

Introducing ‘The Doctrine’: A New Model for Accountability

Challenging the status quo, Lee McCabe proposes a more effective model, which he terms “The Doctrine.” This framework is designed to cut through the typical agency “bullshit” and establish clear lines of accountability focused on tangible business results.

Core Principles of ‘The Doctrine’

McCabe outlines several key tenets of this proposed model:

  • No Agency Bullshit: Agencies should not sell mere activity; their focus must be on measurable outcomes.
  • Measurable Impact: If an initiative cannot be measured, it should not be implemented.
  • Revenue and Margin Focus: Any marketing effort that does not directly contribute to revenue or margin is considered “noise.”
  • Unified Metrics: A single, clear set of numbers, from lead generation to sales and ultimately to margin and retention, should be the standard.
  • Infrastructure First: Prioritizing the fixing of foundational elements like tracking, CRM, and attribution before scaling marketing spend.
  • Single Point of Accountability: One individual must be solely responsible for driving profit.
  • Operational Rigor: Emphasizing weekly decision-making and monthly board reports with reconciled financial data, moving away from presentations and towards direct operation.

McCabe emphasizes that this approach involves building the system first and then running it, eliminating the “theatre” often associated with agency reporting and focusing purely on operational execution.

“We build the system, then run it. No decks. No theatre. Just operating.”

By advocating for such a principles-based, results-oriented approach, Lee McCabe aims to redefine marketing partnerships within the private equity landscape, pushing for greater transparency, accountability, and demonstrable impact on the bottom line.

📝 About This Content

This article is based on insights shared by Lee McCabe on LinkedIn.

📅 Originally posted on February 12, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →