In a recent LinkedIn post, Ruben Hassid ranks 11 AI tools by how useful he finds them, from products he says could “change your life” to ones he would avoid. This article reports on Hassid’s assessment and the reasoning he shares in the post; it was not written by him.
“I rank 11 AI tools from ‘genuinely change your life’ to ‘Wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy.’”
Tools Hassid says stand out
Hassid places Claude Code and Wispr Flow in his highest category. He says Claude Code can build apps, sites and tools from plain-English instructions, and highlights its integrations with Supabase, Vercel and GitHub. For Wispr Flow, he emphasizes voice-based writing, speed and accuracy, adding that the tool continues adapting to a user’s edits.
According to Hassid, these products earn their top ranking by making specific tasks easier. His post focuses on practical uses rather than technical benchmarks, and presents the ranking as a personal recommendation rather than a systematic comparison.
Recommendations for broader use
In the next tier, Hassid recommends Viktor, Happenstance and Grok Bot. He describes Viktor as an AI assistant that works in Slack and connects with more than 3,000 tools. He frames Happenstance as a way to search for people using LinkedIn connections, while praising Grok Bot for being accessible to people who are less technically experienced.
“The only AI agent I use that doesn’t feel technical”
That line captures a theme in Hassid’s recommendations: ease of use matters alongside capability. His descriptions suggest that tools are most valuable to him when they fit existing workflows or make a complicated task feel approachable.
Where he sees limitations
Hassid’s middle rankings reflect reservations rather than outright rejection. He praises Gemini’s design but criticizes the free model’s quality. He says Notion holds his workspace data and notes that Claude and Cursor can now work inside it, while pointing out that Notion’s AI features require a paid plan.
When a newer tool changes the calculation
He places Lovable in a category he calls “could have been a feature,” saying he had used it for tasks including making slides but believes Claude Code now performs similar work better. That comparison reflects Hassid’s view of a fast-moving tool market, where a product’s appeal can shift as alternatives improve.
A deliberately sharp bottom tier
At the bottom, Hassid names Meta AI in WhatsApp, Microsoft Teams and Siri. His remarks are brief and pointed: he calls Meta AI “the AI nobody asked for in WhatsApp,” apologizes to Teams users, and says Wispr Flow replaced Siri for him. These are personal judgments in a punchy ranking, not evidence of a broader user consensus.
Overall, Hassid’s post offers readers a concise map of his preferences: prioritize tools he finds useful and accessible, and reassess products as competing options evolve. The ranking’s value lies in making his criteria visible, while readers must decide how well those criteria match their own needs.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Ruben Hassid on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on November 6, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →