In a recent LinkedIn post, Ryan Reisert highlights a fundamental yet often overlooked aspect of effective cold calling: confirming the identity of the person on the other end of the line. Reisert argues that without this crucial step, all subsequent analysis of a call’s success or failure becomes fundamentally flawed.
Reisert emphasizes that the data derived from cold calls can be highly unreliable if this initial verification is skipped. He poses a scenario where a salesperson experiences a rejection and begins to question various elements of their approach, such as the opener, tone, or message.
“NEWSFLASH: none of that matters if you were not even talking to the right person.”
This stark statement underscores Reisert’s central thesis: the effectiveness of any pitch or sales technique is entirely dependent on whether the salesperson is engaging with the correct individual. Without this confirmation, any perceived failures in the opener, tone, or message are irrelevant, as the feedback loop is broken from the start.
The Problem with Unverified Data
According to Reisert, the distinction lies between actionable data and mere noise. When a salesperson bypasses the confirmation step, they are essentially collecting data points from interactions that may not be with the intended prospect. This can lead to misinterpretations and incorrect strategic adjustments.
As Ryan Reisert notes, the common practice of jumping straight into a pitch without confirming the contact’s identity leads to a dataset that cannot be reliably learned from. This can result in wasted effort and a skewed understanding of sales performance.
Why Confirmation Matters
Reisert advocates for a simple yet powerful solution: before launching into a pitch, always confirm that you have the right name and title on the line. This practice, he argues, is the key differentiator for generating valuable insights from sales activities.
“Before you ever pitch: confirm you got the right name & title on the line.”
By ensuring the right contact is engaged, sales professionals can be more confident that the outcomes of their calls – whether positive or negative – are a true reflection of their strategy and the prospect’s interest. This allows for more accurate analysis and more effective refinement of sales techniques.
Turning Noise into Actionable Insights
The core of Reisert’s message revolves around data integrity. He suggests that many sales teams operate with a flawed understanding of their performance because their foundational data is compromised by unverified contacts.
“That’s the difference between a dataset you can learn from and noise you can’t.”
Ryan Reisert’s advice provides a practical framework for improving the quality of cold calling data. By prioritizing the simple act of confirming identity, sales professionals can move beyond guesswork and build a more robust, reliable foundation for learning and improvement. This foundational step, often overlooked in the rush to engage, is presented by Reisert as essential for anyone serious about optimizing their cold calling efforts and achieving better results.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Ryan Reisert on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on April 17, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →