In a recent LinkedIn post, Tim Denning explores the often-unseen power structures that truly dictate corporate success, challenging the conventional wisdom of organizational charts. Denning recounts a personal experience where his misunderstanding of these informal hierarchies nearly cost him his job.
Denning highlights the disconnect between formal titles and actual influence, introducing the concept of the “shadow player” within organizations. He writes:
“His title meant nothing. His influence meant everything.”
This observation serves as the crux of Denning’s argument: that true power often resides with individuals whose roles are not clearly defined on the org chart but who wield significant sway through long-standing relationships, historical knowledge, and personal connections.
The Myth of the Org Chart
Denning details how he initially believed the organizational chart was a definitive map of authority. However, he discovered the existence of a senior advisor named Steve, whose low-profile role belied his immense impact on company decisions. According to Denning, Steve, despite not managing anyone or attending leadership meetings, was instrumental in strategic shifts, promotions, and project cancellations.
The author recounts a pivotal moment when he bypassed this unacknowledged power center:
“I made the mistake of going around Steve once. I pitched a project directly to my VP, got approval, started building it. Three weeks later the project was dead. No explanation.”
This experience led Denning to a crucial realization about the invisible networks that govern corporate dynamics. As he points out, the real power structures are often subtle, built on “relationships built over decades, in favors exchanged, in knowledge that gives someone leverage.”
Identifying and Engaging with Informal Power
The Blind Spot of High Achievers
Denning identifies a common pitfall among professionals who focus solely on hard work and direct reporting lines. These individuals, he argues, often miss the true influencers within a company because they “think the formal hierarchy is the real hierarchy.” They focus on impressing their immediate manager while neglecting the individuals whose opinions carry unspoken weight.
According to Tim Denning, every company has such figures – those who have been there for years, possess deep institutional knowledge, and whose counsel is implicitly, if not explicitly, sought by senior leadership. He advises professionals to identify these individuals early on.
Navigating or Opting Out?
Denning suggests a strategy for navigating these complex dynamics: understand what these influential individuals care about and avoid making adversaries of them. However, he also proposes a more radical approach for those disillusioned by such corporate gamesmanship.
In his view, the ultimate solution might be to move beyond playing by these invisible rules altogether. He suggests that building something of one’s own, where the individual can set the rules, offers a more empowering path.
“Or better yet, stop playing a game where invisible rules determine your future. Build something where you make the rules instead.”
Tim Denning concludes by asking readers if they have encountered similar situations, prompting reflection on the nature of power and influence in professional environments.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Tim Denning on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on April 6, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →