In a recent LinkedIn post, Emily Lyons, founder of a matchmaking firm, shares profound insights into the common human tendency to misinterpret social cues and the significant gap between our perceptions and others’ realities. Drawing from over a decade of experience facilitating introductions and gathering feedback after first dates, Lyons highlights how the subjective nature of human interaction can lead to drastically different accounts of the same event.
Lyons uses a poignant example to illustrate this disconnect:
“One man called after a date to say she’d been distant and he’d pass. She called an hour later asking if it was too soon to mention her father had died that week. She’d almost cancelled, then went anyway because she didn’t want grief to be the first thing he ever knew about her, and she didn’t want to be rude cancelling last minute. He spent the evening across from someone holding herself together for him and filed it as ‘indifference.'”
The Subjectivity of Social Perception
This anecdote, as detailed by Lyons, powerfully demonstrates how external circumstances can drastically alter an individual’s presentation, leading to misjudgments. Lyons argues that this phenomenon extends far beyond first dates, permeating everyday professional and personal interactions.
Beyond the First Date: Everyday Misunderstandings
According to Lyons, the same patterns of misreading emerge in various contexts. She writes:
“Wanting something makes people worse at appearing to want it. Then we grade the appearance. That’s a first date. It’s also the quiet coworker, the three-word email, the candidate who interviewed badly on a day we’ll never hear anything about.”
In Lyons’s view, we often fail to consider the underlying reasons for someone’s behavior, instead focusing on the surface-level ‘appearance.’ This, she suggests, is a fundamental flaw in how we navigate social and professional relationships. We are constantly making judgments, yet we rarely receive feedback on their accuracy.
Bridging the Gap: Seeking Clarity and Empathy
Lyons challenges the reader to reconsider their own interpretive habits. She points out that the lack of feedback in our daily lives means we operate under the assumption that our interpretations are correct.
“We’ve been reading people our entire lives and nobody has ever told us if we’re doing it right.”
To combat this pervasive issue, Lyons offers practical advice rooted in her professional experience. She encourages direct communication and a willingness to give others the benefit of the doubt.
Actionable Advice for Better Interpretation
As Emily Lyons advises:
- Assume positive intent (or at least neutral): “They probably liked you more than you think.”
- Consider external factors: “If they were cold or short, they’re probably going through something.”
- Ask for clarification: “If you don’t understand what someone did or said, ask them.”
Lyons concludes by emphasizing the subjective nature of our assessments, reminding readers that their judgments are based on their own experiences, not necessarily the experiences of the person being judged. This call for empathy and direct inquiry, stemming from her extensive work in matchmaking, offers valuable lessons for anyone seeking to improve their interpersonal understanding.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Emily Lyons on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on July 26, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →