In a recent LinkedIn post, Janet Kim explores the often-overlooked skill of establishing professional distance within workplace relationships, arguing that not all connections are built for growth and some can even be detrimental. Kim highlights the importance of discerning who to trust and how much access to grant, moving beyond the conventional advice to simply “build your network.”
Janet Kim emphasizes that the ability to manage relationships strategically is a hallmark of strong leadership. She recounts personal experiences that taught her difficult lessons about misplaced trust and the consequences of sharing too much context too soon. As Janet Kim notes:
“Build your network,” they say. What they don’t teach is the equally important skill: knowing when to create professional distance.
Kim illustrates her point with anecdotes where sharing information with colleagues, intended as helpful, led to unintended consequences. One instance involved sharing office dynamics with a new colleague, which, despite intentions of helpfulness, resulted in the information being circulated. Another experience detailed a colleague maneuvering to expand their scope by speaking with leadership behind Kim’s back. These situations, Kim explains, underscore a critical leadership tenet: vigilance and intentionality in relationship management.
The Cost of Unchecked Trust
Janet Kim argues that the belief that experience immunizes individuals against betrayal is a misconception. She states:
Anyone can be blindsided. Experience doesn’t make you immune. Ignoring your instincts just delays the cost.
This perspective challenges the notion that professional growth solely relies on expanding connections. Kim suggests that a more nuanced approach is required, one that prioritizes the quality and safety of relationships over sheer quantity. She draws a parallel between how individuals protect their inboxes and how they should safeguard their time, energy, and context, asserting that granting unlimited access to these finite resources to everyone is unwise.
Strategic Distance vs. Coldness
A key theme in Janet Kim’s post is the distinction between strategic distance and personal coldness. She clarifies that maintaining professional boundaries is not about being unapproachable but about being clear and responsible. According to Janet Kim, this approach involves:
- Keeping conversations project-focused rather than overly personal.
- Employing techniques like the “grateful redirect” to steer discussions back to professional objectives.
- Establishing structured availability rather than being constantly accessible.
- Maintaining consistency and professionalism in all interactions.
- Sharing information deliberately and thoughtfully.
Kim frames these practices not as political maneuvering but as essential leadership skills. She posits that effective leaders are adept at nurturing the right relationships while maintaining a respectful distance from others. This discernment, she argues, is crucial for long-term effectiveness and personal well-being in complex organizational environments.
The goal isn’t to burn bridges. It’s to stop building them too fast.
Janet Kim concludes by emphasizing that the most profound lessons about trust often come from individuals we assume are safe, and recognizing this distinction fundamentally impacts how one leads. Her insights offer a valuable framework for professionals seeking to navigate workplace dynamics with greater wisdom and intentionality.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Janet Kim on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on September 3, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →