In a recent LinkedIn post, Justin Oberman discusses a less-talked-about consequence of integrating artificial intelligence into the writing process: its effect on personal happiness and satisfaction. Oberman shares his own experience of stepping away from AI-assisted writing, highlighting a shift in his emotional connection to his work, even when it doesn’t achieve perfect results.
Oberman opens by posing a question that he feels is overlooked in the current discourse around AI adoption:
“How come nobody is talking about that? About the effect using AI to do something we are good at has on our happiness.”
He suggests that the importance of happiness might be underestimated in professional contexts, leading to a lack of discussion around this specific aspect of AI integration. Oberman emphasizes that his perspective is not one of technophobia but rather a nuanced view on how AI tools are implemented.
The Nuance Between Writing With and Editing AI Content
Justin Oberman is quick to clarify that his stance is not a rejection of AI entirely. He distinguishes between “using AI to write” and “writing with AI,” indicating that he still engages with the latter. His primary concern lies with the current trend among executives who, in his observation, are reversing the optimal workflow.
As Oberman points out:
“And one of the biggest problems I see right now our executives who take human writing and edit it using AI instead of the other way around.”
This practice, he implies, misses an opportunity to leverage AI as a tool to enhance human creativity and effort, rather than as a primary generator that requires human correction. Oberman’s focus is on preserving the human element and ensuring that AI serves to augment, not replace, genuine human skill and expression.
Reclaiming Human Authenticity in Content Creation
Oberman’s reflections suggest a deeper need to consider the qualitative aspects of work, beyond mere efficiency or output volume. The happiness derived from crafting something oneself, even with imperfections, seems to be a core value he champions.
He further elaborates on the potential for AI to detract from this:
“I stopped using AI to write and I write less and slower but I also feel so much happier about what I write. Even when it fails.”
This statement underscores a belief that the process of creation itself holds intrinsic value. The struggle, the iteration, and the eventual output, when driven by human effort, can lead to a more profound sense of accomplishment and well-being.
A Potential Solution: Editing AI for Human Sound
Looking ahead, Justin Oberman is contemplating a practical solution to address the challenges he’s identified. He is considering developing a course aimed at teaching individuals how to effectively edit AI-generated content to imbue it with a more human-like quality.
Oberman frames this potential offering by stating:
“I’m actually thinking of creating a course that teach teaches you how to edit any AI content to make it sound more human in under 10 minutes.”
This initiative reflects his commitment to finding a middle ground, where the efficiency of AI can be harnessed without sacrificing the authenticity and emotional resonance that human writers bring to their work. His exploration invites a broader conversation about how we can integrate AI tools in a way that supports, rather than diminishes, our professional satisfaction and the quality of human expression.
📝 About This Content
This article is based on insights shared by Justin Oberman on LinkedIn.
📅 Originally posted on April 18, 2026 | View original post on LinkedIn →